Deepwater Program: Exploration and Research of Northern Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Natural and Artificial Hard Bottom Habitats with Emphasis on Coral Communities: Reefs, Rigs and Wrecks

Background

Introduction

coverThis program is a $3.7M four-year project from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in August 2008.  This is an interagency study involving BOEM and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office of Ocean Exploration and Research (OER) and will also include additional collaboration with the U.S. Geological Survey.

This is a similar type project to the BOEM Chemo-III project that is currently underway at TDI-BI. It will be multidisciplinary with principal investigators from TAMU, Penn State, LSU, TAMUCC and WHOI.

Up to twenty-four (24) days of ship time the first year and similar number of days for years two and three aboard NOAA OER-funded research vessels including operating personnel, made available by the NOAA OER, will be used to conduct this program. Other research vessels, remotely operated vehicles (ROV), human occupied vehicles (HOV) and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV) from NOAA OER may also be employed in FY 2009 and 2010. The first cruise is scheduled for September 2008.

This study will focus on the exploration and investigation of deepwater non-chemosynthetic biological communities in the deep (>300 m) Gulf of Mexico (GOM) that have developed on both natural and artificial hard substrates with emphasis on deepwater coral habitats. An additional aspect includes exploration of shipwreck sites in the deep Gulf with historical and biological objectives.

Scope and Objectives

The objectives of this study are:

  1. Discover and describe new locations at greater than 300m depth in the GoM with extensive coral community development, particularly including Lophelia pertusa.
  2. Gain a more comprehensive understanding of the fundamental processes that control the occurrence and distribution of Lophelia and other extensive coral communities at depths greater than 300 m in the GoM through both laboratory experiments and field data collection.
  3. Document and understand the relations between coral communities on artificial and natural substrates with respect to community composition and function, phylogeographic and population genetics, and growth rates of the key cnidarian foundation fauna.

Our specific biological objectives:

  1. To discover and characterize new sites:
  2. Characterize key sites at the largest scale with high resolution bathymetry, side scan sonar imaging, 3D seismic data, and current models
  3. Characterize the coral density at all study sites at the 10 to 100 m scale with randomized photo transects and general site descriptions.
  4. Characterize the community composition at the 1 to 10 m scale at significant coral sites (man-made and natural) with analysis of close up imagery, replicate 5x5m photomosaics, and quantitative community collections.
  5. Analyze connectivity among all sites in the GoM (man-made and natural), and to other sampled populations, with comparative community, phylogeographic and population genetic analyses.
  6. Compare the structure, species richness and diversity of communities tightly associated with Lophelia on man-made structures and from natural sites in the GoM
  7. Experimentally determine the tolerance and growth response of Lophelia to temperature, pH/alkalinity, dissolved oxygen and electrical current.
  8. Characterize and constrain growth rates of key species of colonial cnidarians (pioneer colonies) using analyses of images of the largest colonies on man-made structures of known age.
  9. Characterize key variables at sites with the most significant communities of coral colony development over one year by monitoring temperature, currents, larval seasonal distribution and sediment quality and quantity at 2-4 sites between 2009 and 2010.

By integrating this information, we will develop a predictive model to examine the potential occurrence of significant assemblages of L. pertusa or other cnidarians at unexplored sites and artificial reefs in the deep GoM.

  Historic Shipwreck Component

The proposed study will be multidisciplinary in scope.  It will focus on the archaeological and biological aspects of up to six shipwrecks in the north-central portion of the GoM.  Water depths at the designated investigation sites range from 554m to 2,286m.  Each shipwreck will be investigated to determine identity, site boundaries, National Register eligibility, preservation state and stability, associated biological communities, and an artificial reef effect on meiofauna and/or mobile fish communities.

Our specific archaeological objectives:

1) To record each vessel through detailed imagery to establish its type, date of construction, and positive identification if possible.
2) To establish nationality, ownership (past and present), use history, cause of loss, mission and cargo at time of loss through fieldwork and historical research.
3) To determine the extent and condition of the artifact assemblage on each vessel and the presence of diagnostic artifacts.
4) To determine potential eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places through archival research and the analysis of imagery and to prepare a National Register nomination form for potentially eligible vessels.
5) To assess impacts of biofouling communities to these shipwrecks to determine the stability of these sites and rate of deterioration.

Our specific bacteriological objectives:

1) Determine the rates of deterioration of test coupons placed on platforms and sited on specific shipwrecks that have already been visited and were installed on previous expeditions to those sites of interest. Determination may take the form of passive observations of the coupon condition within the platform of interest. If significant deterioration rates have already occurred then the platform may be recovered for on-ship and in-laboratory investigations.
2) Fresh test platforms may be deployed to either replace recovered platforms or to determination the deterioration rate at a fresh site of archeological significance.
3) Examine recovered natural samples from deteriorating sites and localized waters that may contain active bacterial communities traditionally associated with corrosive or bio-concretious growths.
4) On selected recovered test coupons conduct such experiments as would allow a more precise projection of the rates of deterioration of test material through the rates of pitting (in the event of mild steel) to losses in physical composition (in the event of cloths and wood.
5) Recovered bacteriological communities from the sites of interest will be subjected to laboratory analysis to determine major bacterial communities, degrees of activity (using the ATP methodology), and identification of community structures by fatty acid methyl ester analysis (MIDI/BART technologies).

Directed Missions of BOEM and NOAA OER

Acting under acts of Congress, BOEM serves as a prudent manager of the nation’s seafloor mineral resources.  That management role requires development of critical energy resources without unacceptable impact on other ocean users, the natural environment, and the human environment.  The primary strategy that BOEM employs to eliminate or minimize environmental impact is to identify sensitive habitat and then restrict or otherwise mitigate exploration, development, and production activity.  Typically, reefs, other live bottoms, critical fish habitats, etc. are classed as sensitive on the basis of accumulated prior knowledge and directed BOEM studies.  The vast areas of seemingly homogenous soft bottoms are classed as insensitive.  Even in the case of such insensitive areas, BOEM and EPA regulations seek to limit the area and degree of impact.

Increased oil and gas activity beyond the shelf break and US recognition of the 200 m EEZ greatly increased BOEM’s environmental coverage.  Faced with a very poorly studied and remote environment, BOEM supported a series of deep surveys (Carney, 2001) along the Atlantic and GoM continental margins in the 1980’s.  These studies confirmed the existence of vast soft sediment habitats, but also recognized previously known live bottoms, and found unexpected chemosynthetic communities.  Both deep live bottoms and chemosynthetic communities can be classed as sensitive habitats.  It can be noted that the core participants in the propose work participated in these previous surveys in many ways.

The results of BOEM’s first study of upper slope chemosynthetic communities, Chemosynthetic Ecosystems Study (BOEM Report 95-2001) began the trend continuing to this day of submersible-based investigation in a mixed exploration and detailed-study mode.  A second study, Stability and Change in Gulf of Mexico Chemosynthetic Communities (BOEM Report 2002-036) greatly increased knowledge of the ecology of these systems. BOEM-led investigations of coral communities in the GoM began with the Lophelia I study (BOEM Report ) which followed a similar pattern of exploration and experimentation. The ongoing Chemo III study (BOEM contract #) expanded this research into the deepest parts of the GoM and included the latest submersible technologies and techniques to greatly expand our ability to discover and characterize deep-water hard-ground habitats and communities. The scientific value of these studies was increased by the initiative of the core members who successfully sought competitive funds from NOAA, DOE, and NSF.

The work proposed herein is designed to meet BOEM’ information needs concerning the location and functioning of deep coral communities and the association with platforms and shipwrecks.  Preliminary studies have shown that deep coral communities at the slope base are different from those on the upper slope in much the same way that the normal background fauna differ.  Therefore, BOEM cannot simply extrapolate upper-slope data down the entire margin.

Geological Setting

Over the last half century, offshore exploration for hydrocarbons in the northern Gulf of Mexico has advanced from the bay and inner shelf to the continental slope-to-continental rise transition.  Geophysical and geotechnical data collected in support of both exploration and production has been largely responsible for the foundation of our present understanding of slope geology.  This database emphasizes the extremely complex geological framework of the northern Gulf’s continental slope and the surprisingly important role that the expulsion of subsurface fluids and gases has on shaping surficial geology and biology of the modern seafloor.  Regional topography of the slope consists of basins, knolls, ridges, and mounds derived from the dynamic adjustments of salt to the introduction of large volumes of sediment over long time scales.  Superimposed on this underlying topography is a smaller class of mounds, flows, and hard grounds that are the products of the transport of fluidized sediment, mineral-rich formation fluids, and hydrocarbons to the present sediment-water interface. The geologic response to the expulsion process is related both to the products being transported and the rate at which they arrive at the seafloor.  Mud volcanoes and mudflows are typical or rapid flux settings where fluidized sediment is involved.  Slow flux settings are mineral-prone.  Authigenic carbonate mounds, hard grounds, crusts, and nodules are common to settings where hydrocarbons are involved.

The authigenic carbonates that are a part of nearly every fluid-gas expulsion site provide the hard substrate necessary for many deep marine sessile organisms, particularly corals.  Consumption of hydrocarbons by microorganisms at expulsion sites is intimately associated with carbonate precipitation and the production of hard substrates.  Aerobic methane oxidation produces CO2 and decreases pH, favoring dissolution of carbonates (Aloisi et al., 2002). Anaerobic microbial sulfate reduction using hydrocarbon substrates causes sulfate depletion and simultaneous bicarbonate and hydrogen sulfide enrichments in sediments.  The increase in carbonate alkalinity of pore fluids produces calcium-magnesium carbonate by-products (Ritger et al, 1987; Roberts and Aharon, 1994).  These carbonates take the form of distinct mounds with relief of up to 10 m, larger boulders and blocks, and low relief slabs and hardgrounds.

Recent manned submersible and ROV dives to the middle and lower continental slope confirm the existence of these hard substrates to the deepest parts of the slope.  Direct observation and sampling of expulsion sites started in the mid-1980s on the upper slope.
We now know from analysis of 3D-seismic data and submersible-ROV dives that numerous expulsion sites with hard substrates provide habitat for deep water corals exist over the slope’s full depth range.

Deep Hardground Communities (Reefs, Rigs, and Wrecks)

In the context of this study, deep hardground communities of the Gulf of Mexico comprise all of the biological communities inhabiting natural or artificial hard substrates, excluding the chemosynthetic seep communities. These communities consist of foundation species, those species that form large complex habitats at these sites, and their associated fauna ranging in size from large mobile fishes to microscopic meiofauna. The most prominent foundation species in these communities are the deep-water (“cold-water”) corals. The terms “deep-water corals” or “cold-water corals” include relatives of the tropical reef-forming scleractinian corals, but also refer to a variety of other cnidarian taxa including antipatharians (black corals), gorgonians (including bamboo corals), alcyonaceans (soft corals), and stylasterine hydrocorals. Other taxa, including anemones and sponges are also significant contributors to the biogenic framework of these deep-water reef systems.

In the Gulf of Mexico, deep-water corals are commonly found on seep-related authigenic carbonates, but have also been observed on anthropogenic structures, ship wrecks and oil platforms in particular. The most common species of reef-forming deep-water coral in the Gulf of Mexico (GoM) is Lophelia pertusa (=prolifera). This species was first recovered in the late 1800s by the U.S. Coast Survey Steamer Blake (Cairns 1978). L. pertusa “reefs” in the GoM were first reported from a deep water trawl taken by the M/V Oregon in 1955 (Moore and Bullis, 1960). Recently, submersible observations have located L. pertusa in numerous locations on the upper slope of the northern GoM (Schroeder 2002, Schroeder et al. 2005, Cordes et al. 2006, Cordes et al. 2008, CSA, 2007). The most extensive areas of L. pertusa reefs in the central GoM known to date are located on the upper De Soto Slope in BOEM lease block Viosca Knoll (VK) 826. There are more isolated colonies of L. pertusa in VK 862, in Mississippi Canyon (MC) 885 and on the upper Louisiana Slope in lease blocks Green Canyon (GC) 81, GC 184 (Bush Hill), GC 234, and GC 354 between 300 m and 540 m depth. In addition, L. pertusa was observed at the end of a dive in Garden Banks 535 at 580 m depth in 2003 (E.E.C. pers. obs.). Because the majority of investigations of hard substrata in the GoM have been directed towards chemosynthetic habitats, exploration focused on appropriate habitat for coral communities is very likely to expand this range both geographically and bathymetrically.

Deep-water corals have also been observed colonizing artificial substrates in the Gulf of Mexico. The most extensive currently known site of colonization is on the wreck of the Gulfpenn in MC 497.  Two scleractinians, Lophelia pertusa and Pourtalosmilia conferta, were found on the Gulfpenn (Church et al. 2007).  P. conferta was restricited to a solitary, medium size colony observed near the top of the starboard boom stanchion. L. pertusa was far more abundant, colonizing 12-15 percent of exposed surfaces and structures throughout the wreck. L. pertusa appears to have developed most successfully on surfaces or structures that have a vertical orientation (e.g. hull, bulwarks and sides of the superstructures) or that have an upright (e.g. davits, masts, booms and stacks), raised (e.g. catwalks and deck piping), or open (e.g. railings and rigging) construction.  The most extensive coral growth is occurring along the railing, bulwarks and hull on the starboard side and on the deck piping and catwalks.  At numerous locations clusters of adjacent colonies are coalescing in an initial phase of ‘thicket’ building. The largest development is a 6 to 7 m high by 3 to 3.5 m wide aggregate of at least 5 or 6 coalescing colonies. L. pertusa was also found living on the sediment adjacent to the hull and colonizing wreckage scattered about in the debris field northwest and west of the Gulfpenn.

Increasing industry activity in deepwater has resulted in the creation of numerous platforms in water depths exceeding 300 m. In areas where hard substrates are limiting, these platforms may significantly increase the potential range of corals and other hardground fauna. Growth of Lophelia pertusa has been noted on the Pompano platform in VK 989.  In addition, the Joliet platform in GC 184 near Bush Hill and the Neptune platform near the large L. pertusa site in VK 826 are very likely to host coral populations. This study will focus on the exploration and characterization of these communities and examination of their potential connection to other coral populations and surrounding deep-water communities.

Deep-water Coral Biology and Ecology

Although the existence of deep-water corals has been known since the first descriptions by Linnaeus in the mid 1700s (Cairns 2001) and the oceanographic research expeditions of the H.M.S. Challengerand H.M.S. Porcupine in the late 1800s (Rogers 1999), we are still in the process of describing their distribution and basic elements of their biology and ecology. The most well-known deep-water coral species is Lophelia pertusa, a cosmopolitan coral found in water depths from 80m in Norwegian fjords to over 3000m on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and some seamounts (Bett 1997, Rogers 1999).

L. pertusa develops from individual polyps, to larger “thickets”, to massive reef structures. It has separate sexes and exhibits seasonality in reproduction with spawning apparently occurring in September to October in the GoM (Brooke et al. 2005, Brooke and Schroeder 2007), and February in the Northeast Atlantic (Brooke et al. 2005, Waller and Tyler 2005). Gametes are released and fertilized externally, producing lecithotrophic planula larvae (Waller and Tyler 2005) which require hard substrata for settlement (Wilson 1979). Individual branches of coral grow slowly, and current estimates of linear extension rates range from 2-30 mm∙yr-1, although pioneer colonies on man-made substrates may grow much faster. (Mortensen and Rapp 1998, Gass and Roberts 2006). As the branches of the colony grow, new polyps are added via intra-tentacular budding (Cairns 1979). Small, young colonies consisting of living, white coral polyps are normally positioned along the edge of rocky outcrops or authigenic carbonates. As they grow, larger thickets of coral are usually comprised of a periphery of living coral surrounding a central dead portion of coral skeleton that serve as substrate for secondary settlement of L. pertusa and other species of deep-water corals (Wilson 1979). Larger, reef-like structures may cover extensive areas. The largest known continuous reef structure is roughly oval in shape covering 13 km along its axis and 300 m in diameter and consists of coral matrices up to 35 m thick (Freiwald et al. 1999). Carbon (14C) dating has placed the age of dead corals at the center of similar (but much smaller) structures in the GoM at over 40,000 years (Neumann et al. 1977).

Deep-water corals are important sources of habitat heterogeneity on continental shelves worldwide. They create habitat for a diverse group of associated fauna that may occur in abundances orders of magnitude above that on the surrounding seafloor (Jensen and Frederiksen 1992, Henry and Roberts 2007). In the Northeast Atlantic alone, over 1300 species have been recorded living in and on L. pertusa habitats in physical and photographic samples (Rogers 1999, Roberts et al. 2006, Henry and Roberts 2007). On two reef structures alone in Norway, 256 species were recorded from recovered coral blocks (Jensen and Frederiksen 1992). In the Porcupine Seabight in the Northeast Atlantic, 313 taxa were collected in 7 box core samples from coral mounds (Henry and Roberts 2007). The diversity of the community on these reefs rivals the diversity of many tropical zooxanthellate coral reefs (Rogers 1999). However, these studies all involved dredge and box core samples that include species that are likely not be intimately associated with coral structure but inhabit the sediments beneath the coral framework and in the case of dredges perhaps as much as 100s of meters away. In the GoM, 68 taxa of large macrofauna and megafauna (> 1 mm sieve size) were found in closely associated with L. pertusa in quantitative community collections obtained with custom collection devices deployed from a submersible (Cordes et al. 2008). Photographic surveys indicate that a variety of invertebrate and fish species occur primarily and possibly exclusively in these habitats (Ross and Quattrini 2007, CSA 2007, Lessard-Pilon, Cordes, and Fisher in prep). Some associated species appear to have very specific interactions with L. pertusa including the polychaete Eunice sp. which may help to assemble coral structure and the coralivorous gastropod Coralliophila sp. (Cordes et al. 2008; Becker, Cordes, and Fisher in prep).

While L. pertusa remains the best known deep-water corals species in the GoM in particular and the world in general, many other species of deep-water corals exist and are not as well studied. The number of described deep-water (defined as inhabiting aphotic waters greater than 200 m depth) scleractinian coral species now exceeds the number of described shallow water scleractinians (Cairns 2001). In the Gulf of Mexico, 63 species of azoozanthellate scleractinians have been reported (Cairns 1993). In addition to L. pertusa, 3 other species are known to form reef-like structures. Madrepora oculata is a cosmopolitan reef forming species which has been found down to 1500 m depth (Cairns 1978). Enallopsammia profunda is found to 2165m depth and is another common component of the deep-water reef-forming coral assemblage (Rogers 1999). Solenosmilia variabilis has been documented in waters to 3383 m (Cairns 1978). This species is a contributor to coral frameworks in the Atlantic (Rogers 1999) and is the most common deep water reef species on Southwest Pacific seamounts (Koslow et al. 2001). All three of these species were observed and collected at a recently discovered site in Green Canyon 852 during the ongoing BOEM/NOAA funded characterization of chemosynthetic communities in the deep Gulf of Mexico (Roberts et al. 2007). There are also at least 5 species of solitary scleractinians which contribute to the species richness of the deep-water coral community below 1000 m in the Gulf of Mexico (Cairns 1978).

In addition to scleractinian corals, a number of gorgonian and antipatharian corals are present in deep waters in the GoM (Cairns 1978, Cairns 1993). They can occur in the same areas with extensive development of scleractinian corals as well as in areas lacking reef-building hard corals. In either case these taxa add significant habitat heterogeneity and vertical relief. Gorgonians (Anthozoa: Octocorallia: Gorgonacea) are some of the most common and conspicuous sessile coral reef fauna in the shallow GoM and Caribbean Sea (Cairns 1977), and occur worldwide deeper than 4200 m (Bayer 1956). Gorgonians create habitat for associated species of fish (Heifetz 2002, Etnoyer & Warrenchuk 2007), invertebrates (Krieger & Wing 2002, Buhl-Mortensen and Mortensen 2005), and microbial fauna (Penn et al 2006). Gorgonians are also relatively long lived organisms, with single colonies of Primnoa reseadiformis estimated to be between 150 (Andrews et al. 2002) and 500 years old (Risk et al. 2002). Recent reviews of octocoral diversity in the GoM place the total number of species at 162 (Cairns and Bayer, in press). Gorgonacea in the Gulf occur from intermediate to abyssal depths (Isididae, 250-2800 m; Primnoidae 200-1400 m) (Etnoyer, unpublished data). The most common deep-water species include the endemic primnoid Callogorgia americana delta that forms extensive stands at many of the Green Canyon sites and on carbonate blocks in VK 826, and the broadly distributed bamboo coral Acanella eburnea. Precious corals (Coralliium spp.) are rare, but one colony was recently sampled at GC 852 during the Chemo III project.

Forty-two species of antipatharians  have been recorded from the western Atlantic and about 30 of these have been found in the GoM (Cairns et al., 1993).  The greatest species diversity occurs in a depth range of about 20 to 200 m, however, some GoM species have been reported from depths greater than 300 m, including Elatopathes abietina (Pourtales), Bathypathes patula Brook,Aphanipathes pedata Gray, Stylopathes columnaris (Duchassaing and Michelotti), Sibopathes macrospina Opresko, Tanacetipathes hirta (Gray), Parantipathes tetrasticha (Pourtales), andLeiopathes glaberrima (Esper).  Other antipatharian taxa that might be expected to occur in deep waters in the GOM are species of the genera Chrysopathes spp., Heliopathes, and Acanthopathes. Although many antipatharian species form colonies of relatively small size, some are large enough to create habitat for many other marine organisms (see Yoklavich and Love, 2005).  There is, however, very little information on the habitat forming species in the deep waters of the GoM, and very little is known about the distribution of antipatharians in the deep sea in general. In deep reef and upper slope habitats antipatharians can be a major component of the sessile benthic fauna, and it is likely that they play a similar role in the deep sea – particularly in locations characterized by distinct topographic features, hard bottom, and relatively fast currents, such as many of the hardgrounds of the GoM slope.

Deep-sea Environmental Issues and Impacts

With the current push to expand energy reserves in U.S. territorial waters, the activities of energy companies in the deep GoM will continue to increase. Exploration and extraction of energy reserves impact hard bottom communities in the GoM because the formation and occurrence of authigenic carbonates is strongly correlated with chemosynthetic activity associated with hydrocarbon seeps in this region (Formolo et al. 2004). Therefore, the substrate for coral settlement is largely tied to the occurrence of existing or relict hydrocarbon seeps in the GoM. In shallow water corals, direct exposure to hydrocarbons can cause reductions in growth and fecundity, prevention of settlement, and even whole colony mortality (Loya and Rinkevich 1980). In the vicinity of oil platforms in the GoM, increased abundances of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals (Ba, Hg, Pb, and Zn) as well as organic enrichment resulting from the discharge of well cuttings have been shown to lead to changes in infaunal community structure (Peterson et al., 1996). Drilling discharges of cuttings and fluids will smother fauna, cause some mortality and alter both the geological and geochemical habitat.  Such impacts may be greater in deep development due to increased use of multiple wells drilled through a single seafloor template and use of bio-active synthetic drilling fluids.  The dependence of deep hardground fauna on very sparse suspended detritus may make these communities especially sensitive to the added particulate influx since this may clog filter apparatus and lead to stress responses. In addition, the chains and wire ropes used to anchor floating deep-water oil platforms to the bottom have been implicated as the cause of damage to Lophelia reefs in the Viosca Knoll region of the Gulf (Schroeder 2002). Once sites of significant coral abundance have been identified, the standoff and site approval requirements of NTL 2000-G20 will provide adequate protection. In a more general sense, the establishment of a deep-water coral research program in the deep GoM prior to significant anthropogenic disturbance will provide us with a background against which to measure future impacts and may improve our understanding of other deep-water coral habitats in areas which have already been impacted by human activity.

The current lack of a significant deep-water fishery in the GoM also makes this an ideal setting for the study of deep-water coral habitats in relatively pristine condition. In other regions, the past and ongoing depletion of populations of deep water fishes with long life spans such as rockfish (Sebastesspp.), orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), and pelagic armourhead (Pseudopentaceros wheeleri) has resulted in significant damage to coral communities (Rogers 1999, Koslow et al. 2001, Roberts et al. 2002). The deepest commercial fisheries for bottom-dwelling fishes in the GoM remain in waters overlying the continental shelf. However, the presence of economically viable fishery species such as the longfin hake (Phycis chesteri), wreckfish (Polyprion americanus), blackbelly rosefish (Heliocolenus dactylopterus) and numerous grenadiers (Macrouridae) in deep waters (McEachran and Fechhelm 1998) and specifically at L. pertusa banks (Sulak et al. 2007) suggests that there may be current fishery activity that has been largely undocumented, and that a larger commercial deep water fishery in the GoM may yet develop.

The correlation between the distribution of deep-water corals and the location of deep water human activity has led to recent conservation efforts on the behalf of deep-water corals. For example, the Darwin Mounds off Scotland (Bett 2001, Masson et al. 2003) were recently proposed by the European Union as Special Areas of Conservation. The Lophelia reefs off Norway are protected under the Coral Protection Regulation of 1999 (Fossa et al. 2002). In the areas surrounding the Azores, Madeira, and Canary Islands, all bottom trawling is prohibited in depths > 200m. Off New Zealand and Australia, seamounts are closed to dredging and trawling, and a marine protected area (MPA) was established to protect the scleractinian Solensmilia variabilis (Koslow et al. 2001, Hall-Spencer et al. 2002). In 2005, the Aleutian Islands Habitat Conservation Area was established covering nearly 1 million km2 for deepwater coral protection off Alaska. Bottom trawling is restricted in two conservation areas in Atlantic Canada and in canyons near George’s Bank off the New England coast. Off the southeast U.S. coast, a MPA exists for Oculina varicosa off the coast of Florida and a large deep-water coral Habitat Area of Particular Concern has been proposed. In the GoM, the high-density L. pertusa portion of Viosca Knoll 826 has been proposed as a conservation area. To compliment these activities in the U.S., the 2007 reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act called for the Deep Sea Coral Research and Technology Program to locate, map, and monitor activity in locations where deep-sea corals are known or likely to occur. The predictive capacity for determination of areas where corals are “likely to occur” will be developed as a prime focus of the proposed research here and will be a significant tool for future management of deep coral communities in the GoM.

Project Team

The Project Team includes most of the key personnel that were involved in the BOEM Chemo I and II and current Chemo III programs including the Project Directors for those programs. The Project Team also includes key personnel that were involved in other BOEM sponsored programs, most significantly Lophelia I, DGoMB, and Mardi Gras. These personnel will strengthen the assurance of program continuity with previous BOEM studies in the GoM. The project team includes scientists that have worked together as a team since the 1980’s for various BOEM environmental studies programs as well as other national programs.  The expertise of the project team’s staff and their ability to respond to challenges has been demonstrated by their previous project experience.  Both BOEM and NOAA staff are familiar with our “can-do” attitude, excellent analytical and field capabilities, production of high quality technical reports, and peer-reviewed publications.  Our team has established a reputation of quality in the context of competitive costing.  The integrated TDI-Brooks team is uniquely qualified to provide the technological expertise needed to successfully conduct and complete the proposed project.

The Management Team

The Management Team includes a Program Manager, four Team Leaders, and a Data Manager. The qualifications of the designated individuals are well known.  Data management is central to the success of all aspects of the program.

Key Personnel

 

Name

Discipline

Role

Organization

Dr. James M. Brooks

Marine Geochemist

Project Director

TDI-Brooks Int’l Inc.

Dr. Charles Fisher

Biological Oceanography

Biology Team Leader and Interdisciplinary Integration

Penn State University

Dr. Harry H. Roberts

Marine Geology/Geophysics

Geology/Geophysics/Physical Oceanography  Team Leader

Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State Univ. (LSU)

Dr. Erik E. Cordes

Marine Ecology

Phylogeography/Taxonomy and Live Coral Studies Team Leader.

TempleUniversity

Dr. Chris German

Open ocean geochemistry

Sediment Trap deployment and analyses

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Mr. Dan Warren

Nautical Archaeology

Archaeology-Shipwrecks

C&C Technologies

Dr. Ian R MacDonald

Biological Oceanography

Imaging/Fisheries Review

Texas A&M University at Corpus Christi

Dr. Bernie B. Bernard

Marine Geochemist

Lab Director/ Geochemical Studies

TDI-Brooks Int’l Inc.

Dr. Gary A. Wolff

Biological Oceanographer

Data Manager

TDI-Brooks Int’l Inc.

Ms. Liz Goehring

Science communication and education

Education Outreach

Penn State University

Associate Investigators/Co-PIs

Name

Discipline

Role

Organization

Dr. Thomas J. McDonald

Marine/Environmental Chemist

Hydrocarbon Geochemistry

TDI-Brooks Int’l Inc.

Dr. Susan Welsh

Physical oceanographer

Ocean Current Modeling

Louisiana State Univ. (LSU)
Dr. Iliana Baums

Coral Molecular Ecology

Antipatharian Population Genetics and Aquarium Design

Pennsylvania State Univ.

Dr. Timothy Shank

Molecular Ecology & Evolution

Phylogeographic/Genetic Analysis of Coral-Associated Communities

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

Mr. Rob Church

Nautical Archaeology

Archaeology-Shipwrecks

C&C Technologies

Dr. Stephen Cairns

Biology/Taxonomy

Scleractinian Coral Taxonomy

Smithsonian Institution

Dr. William Schroeder

Biology/Coral Ecology

Corals – Shipwrecks/ Platforms

DISL

Dr. Peter Etnoyer

Biology/Taxonomy

Octocoral Taxonomy

Texas A&M University at Corpus Christi

Dr. Dennis Opresko

Biology/Taxonomy

Antipatharian Taxonomy/Phylogeography

Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Oak Ridge TN

Taxonomic Collaborators

Name

Discipline

Role

Organization

Dr. Sabine Stohr,

Biology/Taxonomy

Ophiuroid taxonomy

Swedish Museum of Natural History

Dr Daphne Fautine

Biology/Taxonomy

Anemone taxonomy

University of Kansas

Dr. Anders Waren,

Biology/Taxonomy

Gastropod taxonomy

Swedish Museum of Natural History

Stephen Hourdez

Biology/Taxonomy

Polychaete Taxonomy

Statione Biologique de Roscoff, France

Dr. Tom Shirley

Biology/Taxonomy

Crustacean taxonomy

TAMU CC

Maria Pia Miglietta

Biology/Taxonomy

Hydroid taxonomy

Penn State University

Support Staff

Name

Discipline

Role

Organization

Ms. Suzanne Cardwell

Administration

TDI-Brooks’ Business Manager

TDI-Brooks Int’l Inc.

Mr. Michael Kullman

Geographer

GIS, navigation

TDI-Brooks Int’l Inc.

Mr. Cesar Arias

Archaeology

Geographer, Mosaics

Texas A&M University

Ms. Susan Wolff

Editor/ Graphic artist

Technical Editing/ Program Assistance

TDI-Brooks Int’l Inc.

Dr. Susanne McDonald

Biological Oceanographer

Laboratory QA and HSE

TDI-Brooks Int’l Inc.

 

Participants

Project Team

Affiliation

Email

Phone

Jim Brooks

TDI-BI Drjmbrooks@aol.com

979.696-3634

Chuck Fisher

Penn State cfisher@psu.edu

814.865-3365

Harry Roberts

CSI-LSU hrober3@lsu.edu

225.578-2964

Dan Warren

C&C Tech djw@cctechnol.com 832-461-4718

Rob Church

C&C Tech rob.church@cctechnol.com 337- 735-3771

Ian MacDonald

FSU imacdonald@fsu.edu

850-644-5498

Erik Cordes

Temple erik.cordes@temple.edu

215-204-8876

Bernie Bernard

TDI-BI berniebernard@tdi-bi.com

979.690-6287

William Schroeder UA wschroeder@www.disl.org 251-455-4010

Elizabeth Goehring

Penn State

exg15@psu.edu

814- 863-6603

Gary Wolff

TDI-BI garywolff@tdi-bi.com

979.693-3446

Chris German

WHOI cgerman@whoi.edu

508 289 2853

Tim Shank

WHOI tshank@whoi.edu

508 289 3761

Government

Greg Boland, COTR /CO

MMS gregory.boland@boem.gov

703-787-1711

Emily McDonald

NOAA/OE Emily.McDonald@noaa.gov

301-734-1003

Science Review Group

James Ray

jray16@comcast.net

Les Watling

watling@hawaii.edu

Gordon Watts

iimr@coastalnet.com

Cruises

Cruise 1

Cruise 1

2 September – 2 October 2008

Cruise 2

Cruise 2

16 June – 1 July 2009

LopheliaII Cruise 2 Report

Cruise 3

Cruise 3

19 August – 12 September 2009

(preliminary map)

NOAA OE

LopheliaII Cruise 3 Report

Cruise 4

Cruise 4

14 October – 4 November, 2010

cru4